A new resource has recently been made available to people interested
in studying Philosophy, “Philosophy for the Curious: Why Study Philosophy?” by
Curious Academic Publishing (2015). Lisa Bortolotti was among the philosophers
interviewed for this project. We report here an abridged version of the
interview.
So, our
curious students would like to know what actually the academic discipline of
Philosophy is. How do you see the future of Philosophy in terms of career
opportunities and options? Why should the students choose Philosophy as their
undergraduate or postgraduate major?
Philosophy is at the same time a practice and a body of knowledge. As
a practice, Philosophy invites us to adopt a critical attitude towards received
opinions and by studying the subject we acquire the capacity to assess and
develop arguments for or against a certain position. We learn how to spot
weaknesses in an argument and build counter-examples to it, but also, more
constructively, we learn how to avoid bad reasoning when we propose an argument
for a certain position. Due to Philosophy as a practice, Philosophy graduates
usually have excellent analytical, critical and problem-solving skills and they
are sought after by employers for this reason.
As a body of knowledge, Philosophy is about gaining an understanding
of the issues that matter to us, and to which we apply the skills we have been
talking about. What is consciousness? Does God exist? Is killing always wrong? In
practical philosophy we investigate ethical and political issues and in
theoretical philosophy we ask questions about the methodology of the sciences,
the nature of reality, the complexities of the human mind, and the limitations
of our knowledge of the world, among many others. Philosophy can also be thought
of as a reflection on other disciplines, so we have philosophy of physics,
philosophy of psychology, and so on, where we look at the conceptual framework
within which empirical issues are discussed. As a body of knowledge, Philosophy
does not translate into a career in a direct way, apart from preparing for teaching
or research. But Philosophy graduates often get into politics and public
policy, human resources, law, journalism and publishing.
Now, why should our prospective students undertake a research degree in Philosophy? Can you briefly discuss the research areas in Philosophy that the University of Birmingham is actively pursuing? Are practitioners generally less interested in taking advantage of academic research in Philosophy?
Now, why should our prospective students undertake a research degree in Philosophy? Can you briefly discuss the research areas in Philosophy that the University of Birmingham is actively pursuing? Are practitioners generally less interested in taking advantage of academic research in Philosophy?
As with all research degrees, a research degree in Philosophy requires
passion for the subject and a commitment to contributing to advancing a
specific debate that strikes us as important. A PhD student in particular makes
a very significant investment of time and resources to become an expert in the
topic of her proposed thesis, and it is important to acknowledge that such an
investment does not always lead to an academic job.
We still have PhD students who have just finished their first degrees
and Masters and continue to study because they aspire to an academic career.
But we also have professionals who take time off to explore an issue that has
emerged as interesting during their working life and aim to get back to their
careers after their studies. In the area I am doing research in, the philosophy
of the cognitive sciences and the philosophy of psychiatry, this is very
common. In our department we do have specialisms in philosophy of psychology
and psychiatry, but also in other areas of philosophy such as logic, metaphysics,
philosophy of science, philosophy of mind, philosophy of language, ethics,
global ethics and philosophy of religion. Not only do the themes vary, but also
the methodologies we adopt. In my own research, I work closely with clinical
psychiatrists and psychologists and my papers and books are often aimed not
just at philosophers but at an interdisciplinary audience. Other areas of
philosophical research are more self-contained.
Finally,
would you like to share any best practice tips with our students and
practitioners based on your observation on Philosophy education, research and
practice in the UK?
When I teach I try hard to remember what it was like to be a
Philosophy student and learn from my own experience. Different teaching styles
and approaches can work equally well if the lecturer is enthusiastic about the
topic of the lecture, well-informed, and ready to give students space to think
and time to talk. My aim is to invite students to think about important issues,
learn something new about themselves and the world they live in, develop their
own coherent and sensible argument, fruitfully exchange ideas with each other,
and ultimately engage in the debates currently shaping the field. They should always
feel like active participants, not spectators.
When I do research I try and adopt the same attitude of an eager
student. I read as widely as time allows. I write, get feedback, and rewrite to
make my prose clearer and my arguments tighter. I go and talk to other
philosophers, but also the general public, about my work and hope it can make a
difference, in a small way, to what we think and how well we live. I give talks
at international conferences but I am also happy to use Facebook and Twitter to
share new results, by myself and others, and promote discussion. Recently, I
have started a group blog, called ImperfectCognitions, where research in my area is made widely accessible and new
ideas can be discussed safely and productively. Contributors range from Masters
students to Distinguished Professors, have different disciplinary backgrounds
and are based in different parts of the world, but all share a passion for
philosophy and a desire to keep the conversation going.
No comments:
Post a Comment